Some thoughts on the 'S' word...

A Few Definitions for Thought...

socialistic
1. of, pertaining to, or practicing socialism.
2. like or tending toward socialism.

socialist
1. an advocate of socialism.

socialism
1. public collective ownership or control of the basic means of production, distribution and exchange, with the avowed aim of operating for use rather than for profit, and assuring to each member of society an equitable share of goods, services, etc....
2. In Marxist theory, socialism is the 'between stage' when a society is changing from capitalism to communism, marked by pay distributed according to work done rather than need.

dictator
1. a person having absolute powers of government, especially one considered to be an oppressor.

dictatorship
1. the term of office of a dictator
2. a state under the rule of a dictator.
3. supreme or despotic control.

I absolutely do not mean to sound patronizing by beginning with the above definitions, so please don't take it that way. It's just that I've been thinking about something and these words play a big part in what's on my mind. I think we all need to know the actual definitions of words we hear used - especially when they describe a concept or ideology that is not a common experience in our everyday lives as Americans.

I'm very concerned about what will happen to America if Barack Obama is elected next week. I don't think Obama is actually a Marxist; I'm even not ready, at this point, to say that he's a socialist...after all, he's a member of the Democratic party - right? Of course it's very hard to get anywhere in American politics if you say you're a socialist. There's only one (as far as I'm aware) in the Senate. BHO is THE MOST LIBERAL SENATOR so, actually he's even more liberal than the socialist according to their voting records. Hmmm??? Makes a person wonder, doesn't it? Anyway, I don't think that, if elected, BHO would be sworn in January 20th and hold a press conference before the month is over informing us that America is now switching to become a completely socialist nation. However, that does NOT mean that having Barack Hussein Obama as President would benefit America or most Americans. It also doesn't mean that he would not take America far closer to that eventuality.

Now, added to his response to Joe the plumber, the tape & transcript of an interview he did at WBEZ-FM radio in January of 2001 shows that BHO actually does want the wealth to be spread around. He basically says that the civil rights movement made their big mistake in focusing on the court instead of other avenues like community organizers (read: himself) to bring about 'redistributive change'. Well, he's made it clear that he won't make the "big mistake" of leaving community organizers (like his friends, ACORN) out of determining this country's future. In a speech to ACORN & two other CO groups during this campaign, BHO promised that, even before his inauguration, he would include them in his White House Advisory Panel. Knowing ACORN's involvement in causing this financial crisis and the widespread voter registration fraud they're involved in again...how could anyone want them advising him on how to run this nation? Barack Obama has pledged this to them and it's on video.

When any honest & thinking person looks at his record, there's no denying that he is socialistic...even if not a card carrying socialist.

Now, about the second set of definitions...Let's think first about Obama's cousin Raila Odinga. When he lost the election (where Senator Obama campaigned for him in Kenya) he claimed that it was rigged and then his supporters incited violence killing thousands, mostly Christians. This is the picture of a person with the attitude "It's My way - or else". With Odinga, people died. Next, think about Obama himself...Obama and those MANY Radical associations (not just connections, but long time associations). I also ask you to take a very honest look at the BHO strategy throughout the whole campaign. If anyone dared to say or ask anything that Obama wanted to avoid answering...they'd better duck & fast. Obama clearly believes the best defense is a strong offense. That person was immediately attacked; usually as a racist, but nothing was out-of-bounds for him. They'd say anything to get the attention of media off him...off the question or off information that managed to get released to the public. When a couple of media outlets began to actually have the nerve to ask those 'off-limit' questions, he began cutting off stations/networks left and right. Then an individual (Joe) asked him a real question as he went through the man's neighborhood and when BHO made one of his rare Freudian slips and told him what he REALLY wants to do if elected...fireworks. People began to realize that this guy wasn't being totally honest in his 'campaign-speak'. It was one of those things that he couldn't really spin...oh, he tried, but only the most naive would buy into it. And so what was the Obama campaign's response...what else? The BHO M.O. ...They saw to it that Joe the Plumber was attacked with a fury. This is the picture of a man who has Much to hide; it's a picture of someone who is determined to have complete control in his hands and whenever anyone steps out of the line he's determined they must march in...he'll attack. This is the picture of someone who is determined to oppress anything - any statement or question that does not meet his approval. This is a picture of the type of man who is already dictatorial. This also is a picture of a person with the attitude "It's My way - or else". Within his radical associations, he has ties to Castro & Chavez. When you look at all of those connections and also look at how he responds when things don't suit him and then hear that he admires radicals (including the dictators named above)...how could anyone trust that the super-majority power that is set up in Washington wouldn't go to his narcissistic head?

Which brings us to my last point...the Super-Majority - a filibuster & veto-proof Congress. There'd be critical and extreme problems resulting from the one-party system that would be running this country for at least the next four years...IF not longer. You combine Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank & Chris Dodd and that's Bad trouble for America. Factor in a huge Liberal Democratic party majority in both houses. Add in the most liberal senator ever as President. What do you have? The world's newest up & coming dictator of the late superpower, America: Barack Hussein Obama? ? ? Many people probably think that could never happen to America.... And we all know that nothing can happen to us as long as we don't expect it - Right? ...WRONG! Many things have happened in recent years that we never imagined could (or would).

Obama is someone who has made a career out of presenting himself as a centrist politician when, in fact, he is the most liberal senator we've ever had. He's made a career out of telling each group what he thinks they want to hear (except for slips in un-scripted & unpracticed moments). He's made a career out of being able to eloquently misrepresent the truth and himself.
Seek for the truth beyond the 'Obama Times' media - I dare you while you still have time. Dig deep enough: Barack Hussein Obama's TRUE agenda is very revealing.